 | Discussion on: Image 448 - "2005 B.C. or A.D?" |
| Discussion on: Image 448 - "2005 B.C. or A.D?" |
Discussion on: Image 448 - "2005 B.C. or A.D?" | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Discussion, revisions and constructive criticisms of Image 448 - "2005 B.C. or A.D?" | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bob Wallace (BobTrips) Msg: #1 December 11th 2005 16:21:28 | Nicely composed and exposed. It would have been nice if you could had arranged for the cloud cover to have been a bit lower so that the third pyramid was backlit a bit more. ;o) I boosted the contrast which, I think, makes the lighting more dramatic. Just to give you an idea of what you might do. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Gadiel Rachelson (Chods) Msg: #2 December 12th 2005 15:49:15 | Bob, muchos gracias, looks great. And seems so simple. Gadi | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bob Wallace (BobTrips) Msg: #3 December 12th 2005 16:02:13 | de nada... Most digital cameras produce an image that is low in contrast and not very sharp. On purpose. The less incamera processing the better. Once files are processed one can't go back and do it a different way. (Always work from a copy, not your original.) I find most of my shots are helped by a bit of contrast boosting and always by sharpening. Do the sharpening as the very last step. (Maybe you knew all this already. So just in case....) Glad to have you participating. Post some more and give others some feedback. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Number Users: 2 Number of Posts: 3 | To Reply Join Jeber Photo Clubs - you will be required to join this club | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revision: 1 Bob Wallace (BobTrips) |
